🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
big_lie
The Big Lie is a propaganda technique where a falsehood so enormous and audacious is asserted that people struggle to believe anyone would fabricate something so significant. The sheer scale of the claim serves as its own form of evidence — the reasoning being that no one would dare make such a claim unless it were true. The technique relies on bold, confident repetition and the exploitation of people's difficulty in comprehending deliberate large-scale deception.
Despite all official counts, court rulings, and audits confirming the results, a political leader insists: 'The entire election was stolen. Millions of fraudulent votes were cast. This was the greatest crime in our nation's history. Everyone knows it, and the evidence is overwhelming — they just won't show it to you.'
A demagogue tells his followers that a neighboring country has secretly been poisoning the water supply of border towns for decades, presenting no credible evidence. The claim is so extreme that many citizens assume there must be something to it — 'Why would anyone make up something that specific?'
A viral social media account claims that a popular children's vaccine program is actually a government operation to implant tracking microchips, and that thousands of doctors are in on it. The sheer scale of the alleged conspiracy makes some people reason that such a massive operation couldn't be entirely fabricated.
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Does the claim make an extraordinarily large or dramatic assertion?
Type: binaryIs the claim repeated frequently and with confidence despite lacking credible evidence?
Type: binaryDoes the scale of the claim itself seem to serve as its own justification?
Type: binaryThe Big Lie is a propaganda technique where a falsehood so enormous and audacious is asserted that people struggle to believe anyone would fabricate something so significant. The sheer scale of the claim serves as its own form of evidence — the reasoning being that no one would dare make such a claim unless it were true. The technique relies on bold, confident repetition and the exploitation of people's difficulty in comprehending deliberate large-scale deception.
People apply their own honesty norms to others, reasoning that while someone might tell a small lie, fabricating something this massive seems inconceivable. The audacity of the claim creates cognitive dissonance — surely there must be some truth to it if someone is willing to stake their reputation on it.
Demand specific, verifiable evidence proportional to the extraordinary claim. Apply Carl Sagan's principle: 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.' Track the claim back to its origin and check for independent corroboration.
Historically associated with totalitarian regimes and authoritarian leaders. Appears in modern politics as unfounded conspiracy theories about elections, institutions, or entire demographic groups. Also used in corporate fraud cases where the scale of deception prevented early detection.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.