🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
discriminatory
Discriminatory Framing uses language that demeans, excludes, or marks groups as inferior based on identity attributes such as ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, or socioeconomic class. This lens aspect focuses on how media framing choices — word selection, passive constructions, group characterizations — encode discriminatory assumptions without necessarily using overtly hateful language.
Crime reports that consistently mention ethnicity for minority suspects but not for majority suspects in similar stories.
Economic reporting that frames immigrant workers as taking jobs while framing the same labor market dynamics as opportunity when discussing domestic workers.
Political commentary that describes protests by one group as riots and protests by another group as demonstrations based on group identity rather than the nature of events.
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Does the text use language that assigns negative characteristics to a group based on identity (ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, etc.)?
Type: binaryIs the group characterized as inferior, threatening, or undeserving based on this identity rather than on individual actions?
Type: binaryDoes the framing serve to marginalize, exclude, or dehumanize the group?
Type: binaryDiscriminatory Framing uses language that demeans, excludes, or marks groups as inferior based on identity attributes such as ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, or socioeconomic class. This lens aspect focuses on how media framing choices — word selection, passive constructions, group characterizations — encode discriminatory assumptions without necessarily using overtly hateful language.
Subtle discriminatory framing bypasses critical scrutiny because it does not rely on explicit slurs or overt prejudice. By naturalizing negative associations through repeated linguistic choices, it normalizes discriminatory attitudes within what appears to be neutral reporting.
Apply the consistency test: would the same language be used to describe a different demographic group in an equivalent situation? Identify passive constructions that hide agency. Note when group identity is invoked for criticism but omitted for praise.
Documented in coverage of immigration, crime reporting where race is mentioned selectively, economic journalism about social support programs, and political commentary about religious minorities.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.