🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
framing
Deceptive framing involves presenting information in a way that emphasizes certain aspects while deliberately obscuring or omitting others to steer the audience toward a predetermined conclusion. The same facts can be framed in radically different ways: 'The surgery has a 90% survival rate' versus 'One in ten patients dies during this surgery.' Framing determines what the audience considers relevant, important, and even real by controlling the context in which information is received.
A news outlet covers a protest by leading with: 'Violence erupts as rioters clash with police, leaving three officers injured and downtown businesses damaged.' Another outlet covers the same event: 'Peaceful march turns chaotic after police deploy tear gas on thousands of demonstrators, including families with children.'
A pharmaceutical company announces trial results stating their new drug 'reduces the risk of a rare side effect by 50%.' What they don't prominently mention is that the risk dropped from 2% to 1% — a statistically modest change. By using relative rather than absolute numbers, the improvement sounds far more dramatic than it actually is.
A government agency releases a jobs report showing 200,000 new jobs added last month. A partisan news channel friendly to the current administration headlines it: 'Economy booming: 200,000 jobs created in a single month.' A rival channel runs the same story as: 'Unemployment persists as wages stagnate despite job gains.' Both use the same data but frame it to support opposite narratives.
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Does the presentation emphasize specific aspects while omitting other relevant angles?
Type: binaryDoes the framing steer the audience toward a specific interpretation or conclusion?
Type: binaryWould presenting the same facts with different emphasis lead to a different conclusion?
Type: binaryDeceptive framing involves presenting information in a way that emphasizes certain aspects while deliberately obscuring or omitting others to steer the audience toward a predetermined conclusion. The same facts can be framed in radically different ways: 'The surgery has a 90% survival rate' versus 'One in ten patients dies during this surgery.' Framing determines what the audience considers relevant, important, and even real by controlling the context in which information is received.
People do not evaluate information in a vacuum — context determines interpretation. Framing exploits the fact that which aspects of a situation are emphasized first shapes how all subsequent information is processed. The frame becomes the lens through which the entire issue is perceived.
Actively seek alternative framings of the same story. Ask: 'What aspects are being emphasized and what is being left out? How would this story read if told from the other side's perspective? What frame am I unconsciously adopting?'
Central to all journalism (headline writing, story selection), political communication, legal advocacy (prosecution vs. defense framing), and marketing (product positioning). Framing is considered one of the most powerful media effects documented by communication researchers.
Objectification as an argumentative fallacy occurs when human beings are reduced to objects, resources, statistics, or instruments in the structure of an argument, thereby stripping them of agency, autonomy, and moral standing. This reduction then facilitates conclusions that would be untenable if the full humanity of the individuals were acknowledged. It is distinct from mere insensitivity — it functions as a logical manoeuvre that makes otherwise unacceptable conclusions appear rational.
The semiotic fallacy occurs when the sign (word, symbol, label, metric) is confused with its referent — the actual thing it represents. This is the argumentative form of Korzybski's famous dictum that 'the map is not the territory.' The fallacy manifests when properties of the representation are attributed to reality, or when manipulating the sign is treated as equivalent to changing the underlying reality.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.