🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
jaqing
JAQing off (Just Asking Questions) is a discourse tactic where someone disguises assertions, insinuations, or conspiracy theories as innocent questions. By framing claims as questions, the speaker avoids the burden of proof while planting doubt or suspicion in the audience's mind. If challenged, they can retreat to 'I was just asking a question' and accuse the challenger of being closed-minded or suppressing legitimate inquiry. The technique exploits the social norm that questions deserve answers and should not be dismissed.
A commenter posts: 'Why has no independent laboratory been allowed to test the vaccine ingredients? What are they hiding? Why was the approval process so fast? I am not saying it is dangerous, I am just asking questions that deserve answers.'
A Twitter user posts: 'Interesting that the mayor's new housing policy benefits a neighborhood where his brother owns property. Just a coincidence? Why has no journalist investigated this? Why did the vote happen so quietly? Not accusing anyone of anything — just asking questions the media refuses to ask.'
During a company all-hands meeting, an employee says: 'I am not saying anything improper happened, but why was Sarah promoted so quickly after the new VP arrived? Is there a formal process for these decisions? Has anyone actually seen the criteria? I just think transparency matters, that is all.'
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Are questions being used to imply conclusions rather than genuinely seek information?
Type: binaryDoes the questioner retreat to 'just asking questions' when confronted about implications?
Type: binaryAre the questions loaded with presuppositions that smuggle in claims?
Type: binaryIs the questioner selectively asking questions that point in only one direction?
Type: binaryJAQing off (Just Asking Questions) is a discourse tactic where someone disguises assertions, insinuations, or conspiracy theories as innocent questions. By framing claims as questions, the speaker avoids the burden of proof while planting doubt or suspicion in the audience's mind. If challenged, they can retreat to 'I was just asking a question' and accuse the challenger of being closed-minded or suppressing legitimate inquiry. The technique exploits the social norm that questions deserve answers and should not be dismissed.
Questions are socially privileged: refusing to answer looks evasive, and the person asking appears to be an open-minded truth-seeker rather than someone pushing an agenda. Questions also plant the presupposition that there is something worth questioning, shifting the burden to the responder.
Ask the questioner to state their actual position and provide evidence for it. Point out the implied claims hidden in the questions and evaluate those claims directly. Note that 'just asking questions' about well-established facts is a rhetorical strategy, not genuine inquiry.
JAQing is common in conspiracy theory promotion (9/11, vaccines, moon landing), political attack strategies, tabloid journalism ('Did the senator steal campaign funds?'), and social media discourse.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.