Apps

🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!

Proving Too Much

Also Known As: Overgeneralization of Principle
Informal Fallacy ID: proving_too_much

Definition

A fallacy where an argument's reasoning, if applied consistently, proves far more than intended, including absurd or clearly false conclusions. This indicates the argument is too broad and the principle it relies on must be wrong or at least in need of qualification.

Examples

We should never punish people because punishment causes suffering, and causing suffering is always wrong. (This proves too much: it would also prohibit self-defense, quarantines, etc.)

Children should never be told 'no' because repeated rejection damages their self-esteem, and we should never damage a child's self-esteem. (This would also prohibit stopping a child from running into traffic.)

We should remove all warning labels from products, because adults have the right to make their own informed choices. (By this logic, we should also remove ingredient lists and expiration dates.)

Verification Steps
Verification Steps
Binary yes/no questions that an AI must answer to detect a reasoning pattern in a text.
Each of the 452 aspects has verification steps — simple yes/no questions designed to systematically detect whether a pattern appears in a text. For ad hominem: "Does the argument attack a person rather than their claim?" For false dichotomy: "Are only two options presented when more exist?" This ensures consistent, reproducible analysis.

Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:

  1. 1

    Does the argument's logic, if applied consistently, lead to conclusions the arguer would reject?

    Type: binary
  2. 2

    Is the principle used in the argument overly broad or universal?

    Type: binary
  3. 3

    Would the arguer need special pleading to avoid the unwanted conclusions?

    Type: binary
Deep Dive
The expandable detail section on each aspect page with examples, psychology, and counter-strategies.
The Deep Dive section provides in-depth information about each aspect: a real-world example showing the pattern in action, an explanation of why it works psychologically, practical advice on how to counter it, alternative names, and links to related aspects.