🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
whataboutism_discourse
A discourse tactic that responds to criticism by redirecting attention to the critic's own failings or to another party's similar behavior. As a discourse mechanic (distinct from the logical fallacy), it derails the conversation by making the critic defend themselves instead of pursuing the original point.
Country A: 'You are violating human rights.' Country B: 'What about your treatment of minorities?' The original accusation is never addressed.
A journalist asks a tech CEO about his company's data privacy violations. The CEO responds: 'That's an interesting question — perhaps you should be asking why your own media outlet sells user data to advertisers.' The original data privacy violations are never discussed.
During a corporate ethics meeting, an employee raises concerns about the company's use of underpaid overseas contractors. A senior manager replies: 'Every company in this industry does the same thing, and some do far worse. Why are we being singled out?' The ethical concern about the company's own practices is sidestepped entirely.
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Is a criticism or accusation being deflected by pointing to the critic's own behavior or a third party's actions?
Type: binaryDoes the deflection avoid addressing the original criticism on its merits?
Type: binaryIs the comparison used to imply that the criticism is hypocritical and therefore invalid?
Type: binaryA discourse tactic that responds to criticism by redirecting attention to the critic's own failings or to another party's similar behavior. As a discourse mechanic (distinct from the logical fallacy), it derails the conversation by making the critic defend themselves instead of pursuing the original point.
It exploits the norm of consistency: if the critic has similar failings, their criticism seems hypocritical and thus easier to dismiss. It also redirects the conversational burden to the accuser.
Acknowledge the whataboutism explicitly: 'That is a separate issue. Let us discuss it after we address the current one.' Insist on addressing one topic at a time.
International diplomacy, political debates, family arguments, and corporate PR.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.