🧪 This platform is in early beta. Features may change and you might encounter bugs. We appreciate your patience!
zero_sum_bias
The tendency to perceive situations as zero-sum (one party's gain is another's loss) even when they are not. People intuitively assume that resources, success, and happiness are fixed pies that must be divided, missing opportunities for mutual gain. This bias undermines cooperation and negotiation.
In trade negotiations, a politician argues that any trade agreement benefiting another country must be hurting their own, failing to recognize that trade can create value for both sides through comparative advantage and specialization.
When a coworker receives public praise from a manager, another employee feels diminished, as though the recognition somehow used up goodwill that could have gone to her — even though managerial appreciation is not a finite resource and praising one person costs nothing for others.
Parents at a youth soccer league lobby against the neighboring town's program receiving new funding for facilities, convinced that any improvement to the rival team's resources will directly hurt their own children's chances — not recognizing that better facilities across the league raise overall quality and opportunity for all kids.
Binary (yes/no) questions an LLM must answer to identify this aspect:
Is a situation assumed to be win-lose when win-win outcomes are possible?
Type: binaryAre collaborative solutions being overlooked due to competitive framing?
Type: binaryIs another party's gain automatically perceived as one's own loss?
Type: binaryThe tendency to perceive situations as zero-sum (one party's gain is another's loss) even when they are not. People intuitively assume that resources, success, and happiness are fixed pies that must be divided, missing opportunities for mutual gain. This bias undermines cooperation and negotiation.
In ancestral environments, many resources (food, mates, territory) genuinely were zero-sum. This evolutionary programming persists even in modern contexts where value creation, innovation, and cooperation can expand the total pie.
Explicitly ask whether the situation is truly zero-sum or whether value could be created for multiple parties. Look for integrative solutions that expand the total benefit rather than just dividing existing resources.
Zero-sum bias drives opposition to immigration (assuming immigrants take jobs rather than create them), trade protectionism, office politics, and resistance to diversity initiatives.
Use these tools to detect, analyze, or train this aspect.